Crop Profile for Blueberries (Highbush) in New England

Prepared: October, 2006


 

General Production Information

Introduction

Information in this crop profile was collected by a survey distributed to New England growers in the fall of 2003. A Dillman survey methodology was used to design and conduct the survey. Most percent values in this document have been rounded for ease of reporting.

Survey Timeline

Preliminary Card Notice sent to over 350 growers

July 2003

High bush Blueberry Survey sent to 356 growers in 6 states

August 2003

Reminder card sent to 226 growers in 5 states

September 2003

Second High Bush Blueberry survey sent to 204 growers in 6 states

September 2003

Data Entry Complete

December 2003

Survey Summary Complete

August 2005

Summary of Survey Returns
(December 2003)

State

#Surveys Sent

#Surveys Returned

%Return

#Growing
High Bush Blueberry

#High Bush Acres

CT

42

20

48

5

47

MA

145

105

72

68

209

ME

42

27

64

10

4

NH

87

58

67

15

52

RI

10

3

30

3

28

VT

24

18

75

13

54

Total

350

231

66

114

394

Basic Commodity Information


Production Statistics

New England

Rank in National Production:
(6 states considered as a single unit)

8th

Percent U.S. Production:

2.7%

Acres Planted:

1426

Tons Harvested:

1853.8 tons

Cash Value:

$7.2 million

Crop Destination(s):

U-Pick 63%
Wholesale 25%
Retail 11%
Processing<1%
Other <1%

Production Regions:

Connecticut
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Maine
Rhode Island
Vermont

 

 

Cultural Practices

New England is considered the northern edge of the climatic zone in which highbush blueberries can be grown. As a result, a number of disease problems associated with cold stress are more common here than in other blueberry growing areas. Average plant density is 863 plants per acre.

The ideal blueberry soil is a well-drained, yet moist sandy loam soil with a pH of 4.5 to 5.2. The blueberry has fine, fibrous roots near the soil surface that lack root hairs, so the root system has a relatively low absorptive capacity. Blueberry roots are unable to penetrate compacted soils and have limited tolerance to excessively wet or dry soils.

The shallow root system is sensitive to both high and low temperature extremes. A permanent organic mulch layer (wood chips, bark, sawdust, pine needles) 3 to 4 inches thick is required to protect roots from high temperature injury in the summer and cold temperature injury in the winter and to reduce moisture stress.

 

Worker Activities

Notes on timing, importance, and worker exposure to pesticide residue.

REI = Reentry interval

Pruning

99% of respondents reported this activity

Dormant Pruning

88%

Removal of old Canes

73%

Detailed Pruning

54%

Summer Pruning

7%

Picking of blossoms

<1%

Fall pruning

<1%

Mowing, Cultivation, and Mulching

Irrigation

Fertilization

Leaf tissue analysis

44% of respondents reported this activity

1 time each year

18%

More than 1 time each year

<1%

Every other year

6%

Every third year

14%

 Every 4 years

<1%

 Every 5 years

<1%


Soil sampling

50% of respondents reported this activity

1 time each year

17%

More than 1 time each year

<1%

Every other year

11%

Every third year

18%

 Every 5 years

3%

Chemical Application and Worker Protection

Field activities that may occur during

Budbreak through Bloom:

Cover crop removal (herbicide or tillage)
Scouting for insects, diseases, and weeds
Detail prune for thinning, disease removal, insect removal
Fertilization
Herbicide application (pre- or post-emergent)
Fungicide application
Insecticide application
Irrigation
Strip blossoms from young plants (non-bearing phase)
Bring in bee hives for pollination
Establish sod between rows
Manage row middles (mowing, herbicide application, disking)
Scout for vertebrate pests (add fencing if necessary)
Prepare and repair posts for bird netting

Post-bloom through Harvest:

Scout for insects, diseases, and weeds
Fertilization (foliar feeding)
Post-emergent herbicide application
Hand weed in plant row
Fungicide application
Insecticide application
Irrigation
Mow or cultivate row middles
Hand harvest
Fruit thinning (for young plantings)
Vertebrate control (includes set up and maintenance of bird netting)
Tissue testing (also after harvest)

Post-harvest through Dormancy:

Scouting for insects, diseases, and weeds
Applying herbicide (pre- or post-emergence)
Hand weeding in plant row
Applying fungicide (copper sprays and/or lime sulfur)
Irrigation
Mowing or cultivating row middles
Pruning
Soil & tissue testing
Adjust soil pH
Remove bird netting

Pest Management Overview

Factors considered when choosing pesticides for use

% of Respondents Reporting

Importance

Effectiveness (how well it does the job)

80%

92% very

7% somewhat

1% not

Toxicity of materials available (to self, family, employees) 

81%

88% very

9% somewhat

3% not

Phytotoxicity (potential for injury to crop)

78%

89% very

9% somewhat

2% not

Potential environmental impacts

80%

84% very

12% somewhat

4% not

Impact on non-target organisms including beneficials

77%

72% very

24% somewhat

5% not

Safety of packaging (such as water soluble bags, etc)

77%

50% very

32% somewhat

19% not

Cost per Acre/Unit

76%

44% very

44% somewhat

13% not

 

Insect Pests (and Mites)

Group A – Insect and mite pests identified by survey as most important

Notes for all following pesticide tables: Some survey respondents reported occurrence of a pest but did not give a rating for frequency. Thus the percentage of respondents reporting occurrence may be greater than the sum of percentages for different frequency ratings. More than one material may be used during a growing season, or not all growers may treat for a pest; thus, the percentage of respondents reporting use of listed materials may not add up to 100%. Only those pesticides listed by growers in the survey are included in these tables.

Blueberry Maggot

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 83% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

routine annual control

44%

occasional control

9%

rarely a problem

21%

never a problem

26%


Damage Caused: Maggots feeding within developing fruits renders fruit unmarketable. Berries become soft and mushy. Undetected infested berries contaminate pack-out.

% Acres Affected: 5%

Timing of Control: Apply protective insecticide when berries begin to turn blue or when flies begin to lay eggs, usually late June. Maintain protection until harvest.

Yield Losses: 30% without management, 5% with management
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: In small plantings, it may be possible to trap this insect out with sufficient trap density.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Red Sticky Traps

3%

67% good

NuLure Insect Bait

1%

200% excellent

Yellow sticky trap

1%

100% excellent

Various traps

2%

50% good
50% poor

Hand removal

2%

50% good

100% harvest of berries

1%

100% good

Trap crop wild raspberries

1%

100% good

*Written-in information from survey

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Blueberry Maggot

48% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Guthion

11%

69% full
31% reduced

69% excellent

8% good

8% poor

First cover*

2nd+ cover**

7

2-21 days

 

Imidan

20%

74% full
26% reduced

78% excellent

9% good

4% poor

First cover

2nd+ cover

3

24 hrs

 

Malathion

19%

64% full
36% reduced

41% excellent

41% good

9% poor

First cover

2nd+ cover

1

12 hrs

 

Pyrenone

2%

50% full

50% good

50% poor

First cover

2nd+ cover

0.5

12 hrs

 

Pyrellin

1%

100% reduced

100% good

 

First cover

2nd+ cover

0

12 hrs

 

Sevin

17%

79% full
21% reduced

32% excellent

37% good

5% poor

First cover

2nd+ cover

7

12 hrs

 

Other Pesticides Reported***

Garlic/Pyrethrin

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indar

1%

100% full

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

Neem

1%

100% full

100% good

 

 

 

 

*First cover = about 10 days after petal fall; some berries begin to color

**2nd+ cover = 10 days from previous cover, repeat as needed

***Written-in information from survey

Cranberry Fruitworm

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 71% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

routine annual control

25%

occasional control

17%

rarely a problem

20%

never a problem

37%


Damage Caused: Found within developing and ripening berries. Feeding reduces the crop and spoils marketability of the berries.

% Acres Affected:  3%

Timing of Control: When damage is severe, treat in the following year with insecticide.

Yield Losses: 20%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Effectively controlled by picking off infested berries, which are easily detected because of the webbing and their early ripening. This method is still practical in small plantations with light infestations. Elimination of weeds and dead plant material around blueberry plants cuts down on overwintering protection for cocoons.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Red Sticky Traps

1%

100% poor

Traps

1%

100% poor

Handpicking

1%

100% good

Harvested infested fruit

1%

100% good

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

 

Chemical Controls for Cranberry Fruitworm

35% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Application Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Biobit

0%



 

 

 

Petal fall

First cover*

0

4 hrs

Apply when newly hatched larvae (1st or 2nd instar) begin feeding.

Diazinon

2%

100% full

100% good

Petal fall

First cover

7

24 hrs

 

DiPel

0%



 

 

 

Petal fall

First cover

0

4 hrs

Apply when newly hatched larvae (1st or 2nd instar) begin feeding.

Guthion

6%

71% full
29% reduced

29% excellent

43% good

14% poor

Petal fall

First cover

7

2-21 days

 

Imidan

13%

80% full
20% reduced

67% excellent

33% good

 

Petal fall

First cover

3

24 hrs

 

Lannate

1%

100% full

100% good

 

Petal fall

First cover

3

2-7 days

Restricted use; do not apply more than 3.6 ai per acre or make more than 4 applications.

Malathion

9%

50% full
30% reduced

30% excellent

50% good

 

Petal fall

First cover

1

12 hrs

 

Methoxychlor

0%

 

 

Petal fall

First cover

14

12

 

Pyrenone

1%

100% full

100% good

 

Petal fall

First cover

0.5

12 hrs

 

Sevin

5%

33% full
33% reduced

67% excellent

 

 

Petal fall

First cover

7

12 hrs

 

Other Pesticides Reported**

Entrust

1%

 

100% good

 

 

 

 

Neem

1%

100% full

100% good

 

 

 

 

Garlic Oil

1%

<1% full

 

 

 

 

 

*First cover = 7-12 days after petal fall

**Written-in information from survey

 

 


Group B – Insect and mite pests identified by survey as significant problems in some years

 

Blueberry Tip Borer

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 72% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

13%

occasional control

16%

rarely a problem

34%

never a problem

34%


Damage Caused: In June, before new growth has begun to harden, infested shoots may begin to wilt, arch over, and become discolored, the leaves turning yellowish with red veins and the stems purplish. This injury results in the destruction of the stem’s fruit-production potential in the following year.

% Acres Affected:  0%

Timing of Control: The standard spray program used for other insect pests normally

keeps this pest under control.

Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Prune out damaged tips as observed and burn infected canes.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents
Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Cut below tunnels

1%

100% poor

Summer Pruning

4%

20% excellent

20% good

20% poor

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Blueberry Tip Borer

22% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Biobit

0%

 

 

 

0

4 hrs

 

DiPel

0%

 

 

 

0

4 hrs

 

Guthion

4%

50% full
50% reduced

25% excellent

50% good

25% poor

 

7

2-21 days

 

Imidan

6%

57% full
43% reduced

43% excellent

43% good

14% poor

 

3

24 hrs

 

Malathion

6%

57% reduced

71% good

 

1

12 hrs

 

Pyrenone

0%

 

 

 

0.5

12 hrs

 

Sevin

4%

50% full

25% good

 

7

12 hrs

 

 


Scale Insects

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 69% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

11%

occasional control

11%

rarely a problem

37%

never a problem

39%


Damage Caused: Infestations can result in reduced vigor and yield of bushes by feeding on the plant’s sap.

% Acres Affected:  10%

Timing of Control: During dormancy or delayed dormancy, apply superior-type oil. Treat from March 1 to first bloom.

Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Good pruning is the first step in control of scales on blueberries. Prune out weakened canes.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Pruning

2%

50% good

Lady bugs

1%

100% excellent

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Scale Insects

8% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Superior oil

5%

67% full
33% reduced

67% excellent

17% good

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

-

4 hrs

Apply oil only when no danger of freezing temperatures within 24 hours.

SunSpray Ultra-fine Oil

4%

75% full
25% reduced

25% excellent

75% good

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

-

4 hrs

Apply oil only when no danger of freezing temperatures within 24 hours.

 


Plum Curculio

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 67% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

15%

occasional control

9%

rarely a problem

24%

never a problem

51%


Damage Caused: Found on developing flower buds and later on developing berries. The larva bores into the fruit and eats its contents. As a result, a prematurely ripened fruit drops off the bush. This feeding activity on buds and fruit reduces yield.

% Acres Affected:  10%

Timing of Control: Spray applications made at petal fall to control cranberry or cherry fruitworm are also likely to control Plum Curculio.

Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: None identified

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Harvested infested fruit

1%

 

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: Plum curculio are more abundant where blueberries are located near tree fruit. If possible, plant blueberries away from tree fruit.

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Plum Curculio

17% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Guthion

5%

50% full
33% reduced

67% excellent

33% good

 

7

2-21 days

 

Imidan

9%

70% full
10% reduced

20% excellent

70% good

 

3

24 hrs

 

Sevin

6%

29% full
43% reduced

14% excellent

57% good

 

7

12 hrs

 

Other Pesticides Reported*

Neem

1%

100% reduced

100% good

 

 

 

 

*Written-in information from survey

 

Cherry Fruitworm

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

12%

occasional control

12%

rarely a problem

23%

never a problem

51%


Damage Caused:

% Acres Affected:  

Timing of Control: When damage is severe, treat in the following year with insecticide. Apply when newly hatched larvae (1st or 2nd instar) begin feeding.

Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Disking between rows and raking and hoeing under plants is helpful for management. In small plantings remove and destroy infested fruit, which turns prematurely blue

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Harvested infested fruit

1%

100% good

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Cherry Fruitworm

27% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Biobit

0%



 

 

 

Petal fall

First cover*

0

4 hrs

 

DiPel

0%



 

 

 

Petal fall

First cover

0

4 hrs

 

Guthion

5%

50% full
50% reduced

50% excellent

33% good

17% poor

Petal fall

First cover

7

2-21 days

 

Imidan

7%

75% full
13% reduced

38% excellent

50% good

 

Petal fall

First cover

3

24 hrs

 

Malathion

8%

33% full
33% reduced

22% excellent

44% good

Petal fall

First cover

1

12 hrs

 

Pyrenone

0%

 

 

 

 

Petal fall

First cover

0.5

12 hrs

 

Sevin

4%

40% full
20% reduced

 

20% good

 

Petal fall

First cover

7

12 hrs

 

Other Pesticides Reported**

Garlic Oil

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neem

1%

 

100% good

 

 

 

 

*First cover = 7-12 days after petal fall

**Written-in information from survey

 

 


White Grubs

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 67% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

8%

occasional control

11%

rarely a problem

34%

never a problem

46%


Damage Caused: The grubs consume feeder roots and may also girdle or clip off larger roots. The reduced root system cannot provide enough water to the plant. Damaged bushes show low vigor and reduced production. Adults, especially the Japanese beetle and rose chafer, sometimes become serious pests by consuming leaves, scarring the berries, and contaminating the harvest.

% Acres Affected:  5%

Timing of Control:

Yield Losses: 5%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Growers should check new sites for white grubs before establishing a field, and take actions against grubs before planting. Remove webbed twigs and webworm caterpillars. Remove beetles.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Pick off beetles

3%

67% good

33% poor

Japanese Beetle traps

9%

40% excellent

20% good

10% poor

Nematodes

1%

100% poor

Trap crop

1%

100% excellent

Bird Netting

1%

100% good

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: There is great interest in the use of pathogenic nematodes as biological control agents for the grubs.

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for White Grubs

26% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Imidan

3%

67% full
33% reduced

33% excellent

67% good

2nd+ cover*

3

24 hrs

 

Malathion

8%

56% full
22% reduced

22% excellent

33% good

33% poor

 

1

12 hrs

 

Sevin

10%

36% full
45% reduced

18% excellent

55% good

9% poor

2nd+ cover

7

12 hrs

 

Other Pesticides Reported**

Milky Spore

1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mach

1%

 

100% poor

 

 

 

 

Admire

2%

50% full

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

*2nd+ cover = 10 days from previous cover, repeat as needed

**Written-in information from survey

Group C – Insect and mite pests identified by survey as infrequent problems

 

Aphids

Type of Pest: Insect

Frequency of Occurrence: 68% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

5%

occasional control

14%

rarely a problem

31%

never a problem

48%


Damage Caused: Virus vectors

% Acres Affected:  5%

Timing of Control:  NA

Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: None identified

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Blueberry Bud Mite

Type of Pest: Mite

Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

4%

occasional control

8%

rarely a problem

29%

never a problem

58%


Damage Caused: Bud mites feed on the surface of the bud tissues and bud scales. Injured buds desiccate and usually produce distorted flowers. These flowers may fail to set fruit, or develop into fruit with rough skins.

% Acres Affected:  

Timing of Control: Plants should be inspected for bud mites in September, before the new buds are well formed. Apply immediately after harvest is complete and repeat according to label instructions.

Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Pruning of infested canes provides good control of bud mites.

Biological Control Practices: None identified

Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Blueberry Bud Mite

1% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Phaser

0%



 

 

 

Post-harvest

-

24 hrs

Do not apply after buds are well formed; do not apply more than 2 times per year; do not exceed 3 lbs active ingredient per acre per year.

Thiodan

0%



 

 

 

Post-harvest

-

48 hrs

Do not apply after buds are well formed; do not apply more than 2 times per year; do not exceed 3 lbs active ingredient per acre per year.

Thiodan/ Cottonseed oil

0%

 

 

 

-

-

 

Other Pesticides Reported*

Guthion

1%

100% reduced

100% good

 

 

 

 

*Written-in information from survey

 

Other

Mites: 4% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

Japanese Beetles: 15% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

Wasps: 2% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

Gypsy Moths: 2% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

Canker Worms: <1% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

White Moths: <1% of respondents reported this pest occurring.


Diseases

 

Group A – Diseases identified by survey as most important

 

Mummy Berry

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 80% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

56%

occasional control

13%

rarely a problem

18%

never a problem

13%


Damage Caused: Attacks new growth, foliage and fruit. Spores infect young tissue and cause rapid wilting. Developing fruit becomes malformed and turns salmon or grey by midsummer. By fall, these fruit have dropped to the ground where they turn to mummies.

% Acres Affected: 20%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 30% without management, 5% with management
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Mummies can be raked up and burned or buried by cultivating between rows or by covering with a new layer of mulch at least 2" in thickness. The cultivation should be done just as apothecia start to emerge in the spring, which usually coincides with bud-break in the blueberry bushes. Cultivars exhibiting resistance to the shoot blighting phase of the disease include Jersey, Elliott, Bluejay, Duke, Stanley and Darrow.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Mulch

5%

33% excellent

17% good

Handpick

4%

25% excellent

75% good

Application of Urea

3%

33% excellent

33% good

33% poor

Pruning

2%

 

Handweed

1%

100% poor

Sawdust

1%

 

Handrake

1%

 

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Mummy Berry

56% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Benlate

9%

70% full
30% reduced

50% excellent

40% good

 

-

-

 

Captan

19%

73% full
23% reduced

32% excellent

36% good

5% poor

Early-mid bloom

0

4 days

 

Captan plus Benlate

13%

73% full
27% reduced

33% excellent

53% good

 

-

-

 

Captec

7%

75% full
25% reduced

38% excellent

38% good

13% poor

Early-mid bloom

0

72 hrs

 

Chlorothalonil (Bravo)

2%

100% full

100% excellent

 

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

Early-mid bloom

42

12 hrs

 

Indar

9%

60% full
30% reduced

60% excellent

20% good

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

Early-mid bloom

30

12 hrs

Labeled for this use on a state by state basis.

Orbit

11%

77% full
23% reduced

46% excellent

31% good

8% poor

 

-

24 hrs

 

Ziram

0%



 

 

 

Early-mid bloom

ns

48 hrs

Apply at loose bud scale stage followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom.

Other Pesticides Reported*

Funginex

2%

100% full

50% excellent

50% good

 

 

 

 

Switch

2%

50% full

50% excellent

<1% good

50% poor

 

 

 

 

Neem

1%

100% full

100% good

 

 

 

 

Liquid Sulfur

1%

100% full

100% good

 

 

 

 

ns=not specified

*Written-in information from survey

 

Phomopsis Twig Blight

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 68% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

33%

occasional control

19%

rarely a problem

19%

never a problem

27%


Damage Caused: Infects blueberry stems causing dieback and plant decline. Younger tissue may show no symptoms at first, then exhibit rapid wilting and dieback. Lesions may appear on the stems. Leaf spots have also been observed where disease is particularly severe. The disease will cause premature ripening of the berries.

% Acres Affected: 20%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 5%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Since mechanical damage and cold stress seem to be necessary for infection, avoid careless pruning and cultivating, and do not fertilize late in the summer. Keep the plants well-watered through prolonged periods of dry weather. Avoiding any stresses will help prevent this disease. Cultivars which appear to be more resistant include Bluejay, Jersey, Duke, Pioneer, Darrow, Elliott, Stanley, Bluetta, Wareham, Rubel, Cabot, Rancocas and Pemberton. Prune out affected canes.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Pruning

2%

100% good

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified


Chemical Controls for Phomopsis Twig Blight

26% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Benlate

6%

86% full
29% reduced

14% excellent

86% good

 

-

-

 

Bravo

1%

100% full

100% good

 

42

12 hrs

 

Lime Sulfur

15%

65% full
29% reduced

18% excellent

53% good

12% poor

Dormant/ delayed dormant

Post-harvest

0

48 hrs

Use only once in spring. Do not use within 14 days of an oil spray or when temperatures are

above 75½F.

May apply in late October or when 2/3 of leaves drop on Weymouth and Berkeley.

Ziram

0%



 

 

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

ns

48 hrs

Apply at loose bud scale stage, followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom.

Other Pesticides Reported*

Orbit

1%

100% full

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

Captec

1%

100% full

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

Topsin

1%

100% full

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

ns=not specified

*Written-in information from survey

 


Anthracnose

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: The disease is especially prevalent during hot muggy weather and frequently occurs post-harvest. Occurs only sporadically and especially during seasons with frequent rain and warm temperatures.

 

70% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

35%

occasional control

8%

rarely a problem

26%

never a problem

30%


Damage Caused: Primarily damages fruit but may also infect twigs and spurs. Blossoms, mature fruit and succulent tissue are infected. Blossom clusters will turn brown or black. Stem cankers are rare. Young girdled stems die back, resulting in a brown withering of the leaves. Salmon or rust colored berry rot can ruin fruit quality. Infested fruit often exhibit a soft, sunken area. Spores spread to “good” fruit during and after harvest, causing significant post-harvest losses.

% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Pruning old canes and small twiggy wood for optimal air circulation and harvesting frequently are beneficial. Varieties in which the fruit hangs ripe for a long time on the bush prior to picking are especially susceptible. No varieties may be resistant when the weather conditions are favorable for the disease.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

100% harvest

1%

 

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified



Chemical Controls for Anthracnose

41% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Aliette

0%



 

 

 

Petal fall

First cover*

2nd+ cover**

0

12 hrs

 

Captan

13%

60% full
27% reduced

20% excellent

47% good

27% poor

Early-mid bloom

First cover

2nd+ cover

0

4 days

 

Captan plus Benlate

10%

45% full
27% reduced

18% excellent

45% good

9% poor

 

-

-

 

Captec

6%

71% full
29% reduced

57% excellent

43% good

 

Early-mid bloom

Petal fall

First cover

0

72 hrs

 

Chlorothalonil (Bravo)

0%



 

 

 

Early-mid bloom

42

12 hrs

 

Rovral

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ziram

0%

 

 

Early-mid bloom

ns

48 hrs

Apply at loose bud scale stage followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom.

Other Pesticides Reported***

Topsin

2%

50% full

50% excellent

50% good

 

 

 

 

Lime sulfur

2%

100% full

50% excellent

50% good

 

 

 

 

ns=not specified

*First cover = about 10 days after petal fall; some berries begin to color

**2nd+ cover = 10 days from previous cover, repeat as needed

*Written-in information from survey

 

Botrytis Blight

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: It is present every year, but only causes severe damage during cool, wet periods several days in duration.

 

68% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

27%

occasional control

13%

rarely a problem

27%

never a problem

31%


Damage Caused: Primarily affects blossoms and ripening fruit, although under certain circumstances the fungus can cause stem blight as well. Rotted berries typically have a gray cast of the mycelium and spore-bearing structures present.

% Acres Affected: 30%
Timing of Control: Infection occurs largely during bloom on flowers. The most critical period for infection is during bloom.
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Disease is most severe where excessive nitrogen has been used, where air circulation is poor, or where frost has injured blossoms. Varieties possessing tight fruit clusters are particularly susceptible to the disease.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Botrytis Blight

35% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Aliette

0%



 

 

 

Petal fall

0

12 hrs

Repeat at 7-10 day intervals during bloom if long rainy periods predicted.

Benlate

3%

67% full
33% reduced

100% excellent

 

-

-

 

Captan

11%

54% full
23% reduced

31% excellent

31% good

23% poor

Early-mid bloom

0

4 days

 

Captan plus Benlate

11%

54% full
31% reduced

15% excellent

62% good

 

-

-

 

Captec

3%

100% full

67% excellent

33% good

 

Early-mid bloom

Petal fall

0

72 hrs

Repeat at 7-10 day intervals during bloom if long rainy periods predicted.

Chlorothalonil (Bravo)

0%

 

 

Early-mid bloom

42

12 hrs

 

Rovral

0%



 

 

 

Early-mid bloom

0

24 hrs

Do not make more than 4 applications per year.

Ziram

0%



 

 

 

Early-mid bloom

ns

48 hrs

Apply at loose bud scale stage followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom.

Other Pesticides Reported*

Topsin

1%

100% full

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

ns=not specified

*Written-in information from survey


Fusicoccum Canker

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 65% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

22%

occasional control

14%

rarely a problem

30%

never a problem

34%


Damage Caused: Infects blueberry stems causing dieback and plant decline. On young (1-2 year old) stems, extensive stem infections quickly lead to flagging and dieback of the entire stem. On warm, dry days shoots will suddenly wilt and die due to the stem girdling.

% Acres Affected: 20%
Timing of Control: Spores are released from March to mid-July, and infection probably occurs during this period. New infections occur following rains during the time tender new tissue is present and temperatures are at 50-72½ F. New infections can occur throughout the growing season.
Yield Losses: 5%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Sanitation is essential. Prune out affected canes. Varieties differ in their resistance to this disease. Avoid practices such as late season fertilization that make bushes more vulnerable to winter injury. Winter-injured bushes are more susceptible. Cold stress may play a part in increasing disease damage.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Pruning

4%

100% good

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Fusicoccum Canker

25% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Benlate

4%

100% full

20% excellent

60% good

 

 

-

-

 

Captan plus Benlate

7%

50% full
50% reduced

38% excellent

50% good

 

 

-

-

 

Ziram

1%



100% good

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

ns

48 hrs

Apply at loose bud scale stage,

followed 7 days later. Do not apply later

than 3 weeks after full bloom.

Other Pesticides Reported*

Lime sulfur

2%

50% full

50% good

 

 

 

 

Captan

2%

100% full

100% good

 

 

 

 

Topsin

1%

100% full

100% good

 

 

 

 

Captec

1%

100% reduced

100% excellent

 

 

 

 

ns=not specified

*Written-in information from survey

 


Group B – Diseases identified by survey as significant problems in some years

 

Witches’ Broom

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 68% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

10%

occasional control

16%

rarely a problem

30%

never a problem

44%


Damage Caused: Diseased blueberry plants have broom-like masses of swollen, spongy shoots with shortened internodes and leaves reduced in size. Heavily infected plants produce no fruit.

% Acres Affected: 3%
Timing of Control:  Plant removal after harvest.
Yield Losses: 10%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: The best control strategy is to eradicate the alternate host (fir trees) within 1200 feet of the blueberry plants. Eradication of diseased blueberry plants effectively eliminates the disease from an affected field.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Witches’ Broom

Chemical controls do not exist.

 

Blueberry Stunt

Type of Pest: Mycoplasma-like organism
Frequency of Occurrence: 65% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

8%

occasional control

5%

rarely a problem

34%

never a problem

53%


Damage Caused: Affected plants are dwarfed with shortened internodes, excessively branched, low in vigor with small downward cupped leaves which turn red prematurely. Fruits on infected bushes are small, hard, lack flavor, ripen late if at all, and remain attached to the plant much longer than they would on healthy plants.

% Acres Affected: Unknown
Timing of Control:  NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Diseased bushes cannot be cured and must be removed from the field. Using virus indexed plants is also helpful.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Blueberry Stunt

Chemical controls do not exist.

 

 

Group C – Diseases identified by survey as infrequent problems

 

Phytophthora Root Rot

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

3%

occasional control

11%

rarely a problem

33%

never a problem

53%


Damage Caused: In severely infected bushes, the entire root system is reduced in stature and is totally black. Above-ground symptoms include chlorosis and reddening of the leaves, smaller leaves, defoliation, branch dieback, death of entire canes, stunting, and death of the entire bush.

% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control: Apply in spring before growth begins in established plantings. In new plantings, apply at or just after planting.
Yield Losses: 20%
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: The disease is avoided through careful site selection before planting. Heavy soil which becomes waterlogged or suffers from a high water table should be avoided when selecting a site. Internal and surface water drainage should be improved. Most varieties are susceptible to the disease, although some varieties may better tolerate heavy infections.

 

Other Practices Reported*

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents,
Efficacy Rating Reported

Hilling

1%

100% excellent

*Written-in information from survey

 

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified


Chemical Controls for Phytophthora Root Rot

3% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Aliette

0%



 

 

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

0

12 hrs

Apply as a 5 ft. band. Do not tank mix with copper compounds or apply to foliage with copper residues or phytotoxicity may occur.

Ridomil Gold

4%

75% full
25% reduced

100% good

 

Dormant/ delayed dormant

 

30

48 hrs

Apply only as an emergency use, not as a routine or preventative treatment. *In new plantings, do not exceed 3.6 gallons/A within 12 months of harvest or illegal residues may result.

 


Powdery Mildew

Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

3%

occasional control

5%

rarely a problem

37%

never a problem

55%


Damage Caused: When severe infection occurs, defoliation may occur.

% Acres Affected: 1%
Timing of Control: 
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Some cultivars are more resistant than other cultivars.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Powdery Mildew

1% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.

Pesticide

% of Respondents Reporting Use

Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported

Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported

Appli-cation Periods

PHI days

REI hours

Application Notes and Comments

Sulfur

1%

100% full

 

 

0

24 hrs

 

Other Pesticides Reported*

Liquid sulfur

1%

100% full

 

 

 

 

 

*Written-in information from survey

 

Mosaic

Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 61% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

1%

occasional control

7%

rarely a problem

40%

never a problem

51%


Damage Caused: Infected plants become unproductive. It may take several years for a bush to show symptoms.

% Acres Affected: Unknown
Timing of Control: NA

Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Most varieties appear to have field resistance to the virus. Infected bushes cannot be cured and must be removed promptly.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Mosaic

Chemical controls do not exist.

 

Red Ringspot

Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 60% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

2%

occasional control

6%

rarely a problem

34%

never a problem

59%


Damage Caused: Production of the bush is seriously reduced and the berries become pockmarked and unattractive.

% Acres Affected: Unknown
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Bluecrop, Collins, Jersey, Rancocas and Weymouth are resistant or tolerant to the disease. Infected bushes must be rogued out.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Red Ringspot

Chemical controls do not exist.

 

Blueberry Scorch

Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 61% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

4%

occasional control

3%

rarely a problem

33%

never a problem

62%


Damage Caused: The disease is characterized by dieback of blossoms and young vegetative shoots in the spring, followed by a flush of growth in the summer. The roots suffer injury and production of the bushes can be greatly impacted.

% Acres Affected: 1%
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: The sole control strategy is to remove affected bushes.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Blueberry Scorch

Chemical controls do not exist.

 

Blueberry Shoestring Disease

Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 61% of respondents reported this pest occurring.

 

routine annual control

3%

occasional control

1%

rarely a problem

33%

never a problem

63%


Damage Caused: Diseased leaves are narrow, wavy, and somewhat sickle-shaped. Flowers may be red-streaked, and berries turn purple prematurely. Within a few years, berry production drops dramatically.

% Acres Affected: 1%
Timing of Control: NA

Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None identified
Cultural Control Practices: Prevent disease introduction by buying disease-free plants, destroying wild plants near the planting, and removing diseased plants.

Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified

Chemical Controls for Blueberry Shoestring Disease

Chemical controls do not exist.

 

Crown Gall

Type of Pest: Bacteria
Frequency of Occurrence: Since blueberries are grown on acid soils, and the crown gall bacterium does not grow well in an acid situation, the disease occurs infrequently.

 

62%