Crop Profile for Blueberries (Highbush) in New England
Prepared: October, 2006
General Production Information
Introduction
Information in this crop profile was collected by a survey distributed to New England growers in the fall of 2003. A Dillman survey methodology was used to design and conduct the survey. Most percent values in this document have been rounded for ease of reporting.
Survey Timeline
|
Preliminary Card Notice sent to over 350 growers |
July 2003 |
|
High bush Blueberry Survey sent to 356 growers in 6 states |
August 2003 |
|
Reminder card sent to 226 growers in 5 states |
September 2003 |
|
Second High Bush Blueberry survey sent to 204 growers in 6 states |
September 2003 |
|
Data Entry Complete |
December 2003 |
|
Survey Summary Complete |
August 2005 |
Summary of Survey Returns
(December 2003)
|
State |
#Surveys Sent |
#Surveys Returned |
%Return |
#Growing |
#High Bush Acres |
|
CT |
42 |
20 |
48 |
5 |
47 |
|
MA |
145 |
105 |
72 |
68 |
209 |
|
ME |
42 |
27 |
64 |
10 |
4 |
|
NH |
87 |
58 |
67 |
15 |
52 |
|
RI |
10 |
3 |
30 |
3 |
28 |
|
VT |
24 |
18 |
75 |
13 |
54 |
|
Total |
350 |
231 |
66 |
114 |
394 |
Basic Commodity Information
Production Statistics
New England |
|
|
Rank in
National Production: |
8th |
|
Percent U.S. Production: |
2.7% |
|
Acres Planted: |
1426 |
|
Tons Harvested: |
1853.8 tons |
|
Cash Value: |
$7.2 million |
|
Crop Destination(s): |
U-Pick 63% |
|
Production Regions: |
Connecticut |
Cultural Practices
New England is considered the northern edge of the climatic zone in which highbush blueberries can be grown. As a result, a number of disease problems associated with cold stress are more common here than in other blueberry growing areas. Average plant density is 863 plants per acre.
The ideal blueberry soil is a well-drained, yet moist sandy loam soil with a pH of 4.5 to 5.2. The blueberry has fine, fibrous roots near the soil surface that lack root hairs, so the root system has a relatively low absorptive capacity. Blueberry roots are unable to penetrate compacted soils and have limited tolerance to excessively wet or dry soils.
The shallow root system is sensitive to both high and low temperature extremes. A permanent organic mulch layer (wood chips, bark, sawdust, pine needles) 3 to 4 inches thick is required to protect roots from high temperature injury in the summer and cold temperature injury in the winter and to reduce moisture stress.
Worker Activities
Notes on timing, importance, and worker exposure to pesticide residue.
REI = Reentry interval
Pruning
99% of respondents reported this activity
|
Dormant Pruning |
88% |
|
Removal of old Canes |
73% |
|
Detailed Pruning |
54% |
|
Summer Pruning |
7% |
|
Picking of blossoms |
<1% |
|
Fall pruning |
<1% |
Mowing, Cultivation, and Mulching
Irrigation
Fertilization
|
Leaf tissue analysis |
44% of respondents reported this activity |
|
1 time each year |
18% |
|
More than 1 time each year |
<1% |
|
Every other year |
6% |
|
Every third year |
14% |
|
Every 4 years |
<1% |
|
Every 5 years |
<1% |
|
Soil sampling |
50% of respondents reported this activity |
|
1 time each year |
17% |
|
More than 1 time each year |
<1% |
|
Every other year |
11% |
|
Every third year |
18% |
|
Every 5 years |
3% |
Chemical Application and Worker Protection
Field activities that may occur during
Budbreak through Bloom:
Cover crop removal (herbicide or tillage)Post-bloom through Harvest:
Scout for insects, diseases, and weedsPost-harvest through Dormancy:
Scouting for insects, diseases, and weedsPest Management Overview
|
Factors considered when choosing pesticides for use |
% of Respondents Reporting |
Importance |
|
Effectiveness (how well it does the job) |
80% |
92% very 7% somewhat 1% not |
|
Toxicity of materials available (to self, family, employees) |
81% |
88% very 9% somewhat 3% not |
|
Phytotoxicity (potential for injury to crop) |
78% |
89% very 9% somewhat 2% not |
|
Potential environmental impacts |
80% |
84% very 12% somewhat 4% not |
|
Impact on non-target organisms including beneficials |
77% |
72% very 24% somewhat 5% not |
|
Safety of packaging (such as water soluble bags, etc) |
77% |
50% very 32% somewhat 19% not |
|
Cost per Acre/Unit |
76% |
44% very 44% somewhat 13% not |
Insect Pests (and Mites)
Group A – Insect and mite pests identified by survey as most important
Notes for all following pesticide tables: Some survey respondents reported occurrence of a pest but did not give a rating for frequency. Thus the percentage of respondents reporting occurrence may be greater than the sum of percentages for different frequency ratings. More than one material may be used during a growing season, or not all growers may treat for a pest; thus, the percentage of respondents reporting use of listed materials may not add up to 100%. Only those pesticides listed by growers in the survey are included in these tables.
Blueberry Maggot
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 83% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
44% |
|
occasional control |
9% |
|
rarely a problem |
21% |
|
never a problem |
26% |
Damage Caused: Maggots feeding
within developing fruits renders fruit unmarketable. Berries become soft and
mushy. Undetected infested berries contaminate pack-out.
% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control: Apply protective insecticide when berries begin to turn blue or when flies begin to lay eggs, usually late June. Maintain protection until harvest.
Yield Losses: 30% without
management, 5% with management
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: In small
plantings, it may be possible to trap this insect out with sufficient trap
density.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Red Sticky Traps |
3% |
67% good |
|
NuLure Insect Bait |
1% |
200% excellent |
|
Yellow sticky trap |
1% |
100% excellent |
|
Various traps |
2% |
50% good |
|
Hand removal |
2% |
50% good |
|
100% harvest of berries |
1% |
100% good |
|
Trap crop wild raspberries |
1% |
100% good |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Blueberry Maggot
48% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Guthion |
11% |
69% full |
69% excellent 8% good 8% poor |
First cover* 2nd+ cover** |
7 |
2-21 days |
|
|
Imidan |
20% |
74% full |
78% excellent 9% good 4% poor |
First cover 2nd+ cover |
3 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Malathion |
19% |
64% full |
41% excellent 41% good 9% poor |
First cover 2nd+ cover |
1 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Pyrenone |
2% |
50% full |
50% good 50% poor |
First cover 2nd+ cover |
0.5 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Pyrellin |
1% |
100% reduced |
100% good
|
First cover 2nd+ cover |
0 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Sevin |
17% |
79% full |
32% excellent 37% good 5% poor |
First cover 2nd+ cover |
7 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported*** |
|||||||
|
Garlic/Pyrethrin |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indar |
1% |
100% full |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
|
Neem |
1% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
*First cover = about 10 days after petal fall; some berries begin to color
**2nd+ cover = 10 days from previous cover, repeat as needed
***Written-in information from survey
Cranberry Fruitworm
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 71% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
25% |
|
occasional control |
17% |
|
rarely a problem |
20% |
|
never a problem |
37% |
Damage Caused: Found within
developing and ripening berries. Feeding reduces the crop and spoils
marketability of the berries.
% Acres Affected: 3%
Timing of Control: When damage is severe, treat in the following year with insecticide.
Yield Losses: 20%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices:
Effectively controlled by picking off infested berries, which are easily
detected because of the webbing and their early ripening. This method is still
practical in small plantations with light infestations. Elimination of weeds
and dead plant material around blueberry plants cuts down on overwintering
protection for cocoons.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Red Sticky Traps |
1% |
100% poor |
|
Traps |
1% |
100% poor |
|
Handpicking |
1% |
100% good |
|
Harvested infested fruit |
1% |
100% good |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Cranberry Fruitworm
35% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Application Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Biobit |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover* |
0 |
4 hrs |
Apply when newly hatched larvae (1st or 2nd instar) begin feeding. |
|
Diazinon |
2% |
100% full |
100% good |
Petal fall First cover |
7 |
24 hrs |
|
|
DiPel |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover |
0 |
4 hrs |
Apply when newly hatched larvae (1st or 2nd instar) begin feeding. |
|
Guthion |
6% |
71% full |
29% excellent 43% good 14% poor |
Petal fall First cover |
7 |
2-21 days |
|
|
Imidan |
13% |
80% full |
67% excellent 33% good
|
Petal fall First cover |
3 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Lannate |
1% |
100% full |
100% good
|
Petal fall First cover |
3 |
2-7 days |
Restricted use; do not apply more than 3.6 ai per acre or make more than 4 applications. |
|
Malathion |
9% |
50% full |
30% excellent 50% good
|
Petal fall First cover |
1 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Methoxychlor |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover |
14 |
12 |
|
|
Pyrenone |
1% |
100% full |
100% good
|
Petal fall First cover |
0.5 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Sevin |
5% |
33% full |
67% excellent
|
Petal fall First cover |
7 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported** |
|||||||
|
Entrust |
1% |
|
100% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Neem |
1% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Garlic Oil |
1% |
<1% full |
|
|
|
|
|
*First cover = 7-12 days after petal fall
**Written-in information from survey
Group B – Insect and mite pests identified by survey as significant problems in some years
Blueberry Tip Borer
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 72% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
13% |
|
occasional control |
16% |
|
rarely a problem |
34% |
|
never a problem |
34% |
Damage Caused: In June, before new
growth has begun to harden, infested shoots may begin to wilt, arch over, and
become discolored, the leaves turning yellowish with red veins and the stems
purplish. This injury results in the destruction of the stem’s fruit-production
potential in the following year.
% Acres Affected: 0%
Timing of Control: The standard spray program used for other insect pests normally
keeps this pest under control.
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Prune
out damaged tips as observed and burn infected canes.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents |
Of Respondents, |
|
Cut below tunnels |
1% |
100% poor |
|
Summer Pruning |
4% |
20% excellent 20% good 20% poor |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Blueberry Tip Borer
22% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Biobit |
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
4 hrs |
|
|
DiPel |
0% |
|
|
|
0 |
4 hrs |
|
|
Guthion |
4% |
50% full |
25% excellent 50% good 25% poor |
|
7 |
2-21 days |
|
|
Imidan |
6% |
57% full |
43% excellent 43% good 14% poor |
|
3 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Malathion |
6% |
57% reduced |
71% good |
|
1 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Pyrenone |
0% |
|
|
|
0.5 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Sevin |
4% |
50% full |
25% good |
|
7 |
12 hrs |
|
Scale Insects
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 69% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
11% |
|
occasional control |
11% |
|
rarely a problem |
37% |
|
never a problem |
39% |
Damage Caused: Infestations can
result in reduced vigor and yield of bushes by feeding on the plant’s sap.
% Acres Affected: 10%
Timing of Control: During dormancy or delayed dormancy, apply superior-type oil. Treat from March 1 to first bloom.
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Good
pruning is the first step in control of scales on blueberries. Prune out
weakened canes.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Pruning |
2% |
50% good |
|
Lady bugs |
1% |
100% excellent |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Scale Insects
8% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Superior oil |
5% |
67% full |
67% excellent 17% good
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant |
- |
4 hrs |
Apply oil only when no danger of freezing temperatures within 24 hours. |
|
SunSpray Ultra-fine Oil |
4% |
75% full |
25% excellent 75% good
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant |
- |
4 hrs |
Apply oil only when no danger of freezing temperatures within 24 hours. |
Plum Curculio
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 67% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
15% |
|
occasional control |
9% |
|
rarely a problem |
24% |
|
never a problem |
51% |
Damage Caused: Found on developing
flower buds and later on developing berries. The larva bores into the fruit and
eats its contents. As a result, a prematurely ripened fruit drops off the bush.
This feeding activity on buds and fruit reduces yield.
% Acres Affected: 10%
Timing of Control: Spray applications made at petal fall to control cranberry or cherry fruitworm are also likely to control Plum Curculio.
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: None
identified
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Harvested infested fruit |
1% |
|
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: Plum curculio are more abundant where blueberries are located near tree fruit. If possible, plant blueberries away from tree fruit.
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Plum Curculio
17% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Guthion |
5% |
50% full |
67% excellent 33% good |
|
7 |
2-21 days |
|
|
Imidan |
9% |
70% full |
20% excellent 70% good |
|
3 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Sevin |
6% |
29% full |
14% excellent 57% good |
|
7 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Neem |
1% |
100% reduced |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
*Written-in information from survey
Cherry Fruitworm
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
12% |
|
occasional control |
12% |
|
rarely a problem |
23% |
|
never a problem |
51% |
Damage Caused:
% Acres Affected:
Timing of Control: When damage is severe, treat in the following year with insecticide. Apply when newly hatched larvae (1st or 2nd instar) begin feeding.
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Disking
between rows and raking and hoeing under plants is helpful for management. In
small plantings remove and destroy infested fruit, which turns prematurely blue
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Harvested infested fruit |
1% |
100% good |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Cherry Fruitworm
27% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Biobit |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover* |
0 |
4 hrs |
|
|
DiPel |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover |
0 |
4 hrs |
|
|
Guthion |
5% |
50% full |
50% excellent 33% good 17% poor |
Petal fall First cover |
7 |
2-21 days |
|
|
Imidan |
7% |
75% full |
38% excellent 50% good
|
Petal fall First cover |
3 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Malathion |
8% |
33% full |
22% excellent 44% good |
Petal fall First cover |
1 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Pyrenone |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover |
0.5 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Sevin |
4% |
40% full |
20% good
|
Petal fall First cover |
7 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported** |
|||||||
|
Garlic Oil |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neem |
1% |
|
100% good |
|
|
|
|
*First cover = 7-12 days after petal fall
**Written-in information from survey
White Grubs
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 67% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
8% |
|
occasional control |
11% |
|
rarely a problem |
34% |
|
never a problem |
46% |
Damage Caused: The grubs consume feeder roots and may also girdle or clip
off larger roots. The reduced root system cannot provide enough water to the
plant. Damaged bushes show low vigor and reduced production. Adults, especially
the Japanese beetle and rose chafer, sometimes become serious pests by
consuming leaves, scarring the berries, and contaminating the harvest.
% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 5%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Growers
should check new sites for white grubs before establishing a field, and take
actions against grubs before planting. Remove webbed twigs and webworm
caterpillars. Remove beetles.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Pick off beetles |
3% |
67% good 33% poor |
|
Japanese Beetle traps |
9% |
40% excellent 20% good 10% poor |
|
Nematodes |
1% |
100% poor |
|
Trap crop |
1% |
100% excellent |
|
Bird Netting |
1% |
100% good |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological Control Practices: There is great interest in the use of pathogenic nematodes as biological control agents for the grubs.
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for White Grubs
26% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Imidan |
3% |
67% full |
33% excellent 67% good |
2nd+ cover* |
3 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Malathion |
8% |
56% full |
22% excellent 33% good 33% poor |
|
1 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Sevin |
10% |
36% full |
18% excellent 55% good 9% poor |
2nd+ cover |
7 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported** |
|||||||
|
Milky Spore |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mach |
1% |
|
100% poor |
|
|
|
|
|
Admire |
2% |
50% full |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
*2nd+ cover = 10 days from previous cover, repeat as needed
**Written-in information from survey
Group C – Insect and mite pests identified by survey as infrequent problems
Aphids
Type of Pest: Insect
Frequency of Occurrence: 68% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
5% |
|
occasional control |
14% |
|
rarely a problem |
31% |
|
never a problem |
48% |
Damage Caused: Virus vectors
% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: None
identified
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest
Control Practices: None identified
Blueberry Bud Mite
Type of Pest: Mite
Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
4% |
|
occasional control |
8% |
|
rarely a problem |
29% |
|
never a problem |
58% |
Damage Caused: Bud mites feed on the
surface of the bud tissues and bud scales. Injured buds desiccate and usually
produce distorted flowers. These flowers may fail to set fruit, or develop into
fruit with rough skins.
% Acres Affected:
Timing of Control: Plants should be inspected for bud mites in September, before the new buds are well formed. Apply immediately after harvest is complete and repeat according to label instructions.
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Pruning
of infested canes provides good control of bud mites.
Biological Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None identified
Chemical Controls for Blueberry Bud Mite
1% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Phaser |
0% |
|
|
Post-harvest |
- |
24 hrs |
Do not apply after buds are well formed; do not apply more than 2 times per year; do not exceed 3 lbs active ingredient per acre per year. |
|
Thiodan |
0% |
|
|
Post-harvest |
- |
48 hrs |
Do not apply after buds are well formed; do not apply more than 2 times per year; do not exceed 3 lbs active ingredient per acre per year. |
|
Thiodan/ Cottonseed oil |
0% |
|
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Guthion |
1% |
100% reduced |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
*Written-in information from survey
Other
Mites: 4% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
Japanese Beetles: 15% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
Wasps: 2% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
Gypsy Moths: 2% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
Canker Worms: <1% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
White Moths: <1% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
Diseases
Group A – Diseases identified by survey as most important
Mummy Berry
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 80% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
56% |
|
occasional control |
13% |
|
rarely a problem |
18% |
|
never a problem |
13% |
Damage Caused: Attacks new growth,
foliage and fruit. Spores infect young tissue and cause rapid wilting.
Developing fruit becomes malformed and turns salmon or grey by midsummer. By
fall, these fruit have dropped to the ground where they turn to mummies.
% Acres Affected: 20%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 30% without
management, 5% with management
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Mummies
can be raked up and burned or buried by cultivating between rows or by covering
with a new layer of mulch at least 2" in thickness. The cultivation should
be done just as apothecia start to emerge in the spring, which usually
coincides with bud-break in the blueberry bushes. Cultivars exhibiting
resistance to the shoot blighting phase of the disease include Jersey, Elliott,
Bluejay, Duke, Stanley and Darrow.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Mulch |
5% |
33% excellent 17% good |
|
Handpick |
4% |
25% excellent 75% good |
|
Application of Urea |
3% |
33% excellent 33% good 33% poor |
|
Pruning |
2% |
|
|
Handweed |
1% |
100% poor |
|
Sawdust |
1% |
|
|
Handrake |
1% |
|
*Written-in information from survey
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical
Controls for Mummy Berry
56% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Benlate |
9% |
70% full |
50% excellent 40% good |
|
- |
- |
|
|
Captan |
19% |
73% full |
32% excellent 36% good 5% poor |
Early-mid bloom |
0 |
4 days |
|
|
Captan plus Benlate |
13% |
73% full |
33% excellent 53% good |
|
- |
- |
|
|
Captec |
7% |
75% full |
38% excellent 38% good 13% poor |
Early-mid bloom |
0 |
72 hrs |
|
|
Chlorothalonil (Bravo) |
2% |
100% full |
100% excellent
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant Early-mid bloom |
42 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Indar |
9% |
60% full |
60% excellent 20% good
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant Early-mid bloom |
30 |
12 hrs |
Labeled for this use on a state by state basis. |
|
Orbit |
11% |
77% full |
46% excellent 31% good 8% poor |
|
- |
24 hrs |
|
|
Ziram |
0% |
|
|
Early-mid bloom |
ns |
48 hrs |
Apply at loose bud scale stage followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom. |
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Funginex |
2% |
100% full |
50% excellent 50% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Switch |
2% |
50% full |
50% excellent <1% good 50% poor |
|
|
|
|
|
Neem |
1% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid Sulfur |
1% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
ns=not specified
*Written-in information from survey
Phomopsis Twig Blight
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 68% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
33% |
|
occasional control |
19% |
|
rarely a problem |
19% |
|
never a problem |
27% |
Damage Caused: Infects blueberry
stems causing dieback and plant decline. Younger tissue may show no symptoms at
first, then exhibit rapid wilting and dieback. Lesions may appear on the stems.
Leaf spots have also been observed where disease is particularly severe. The
disease will cause premature ripening of the berries.
% Acres Affected: 20%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 5%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Since mechanical damage and cold stress seem to be necessary
for infection, avoid careless pruning and cultivating, and do not fertilize
late in the summer. Keep the plants well-watered through prolonged periods of
dry weather. Avoiding any stresses will help prevent this disease. Cultivars
which appear to be more resistant include Bluejay, Jersey, Duke, Pioneer,
Darrow, Elliott, Stanley, Bluetta, Wareham, Rubel, Cabot, Rancocas and
Pemberton. Prune
out affected canes.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Pruning |
2% |
100% good |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Phomopsis Twig Blight
26% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Benlate |
6% |
86% full |
14% excellent 86% good |
|
- |
- |
|
|
Bravo |
1% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
42 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Lime Sulfur |
15% |
65% full |
18% excellent 53% good 12% poor |
Dormant/ delayed dormant Post-harvest |
0 |
48 hrs |
Use only once in spring. Do not use within 14 days of an oil spray or when temperatures are above 75½F. May apply in late October or when 2/3 of leaves drop on Weymouth and Berkeley. |
|
Ziram |
0% |
|
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant |
ns |
48 hrs |
Apply at loose bud scale stage, followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom. |
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Orbit |
1% |
100% full |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
|
Captec |
1% |
100% full |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
|
Topsin |
1% |
100% full |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
ns=not specified
*Written-in information from survey
Anthracnose
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: The disease
is especially prevalent during hot muggy weather and frequently occurs
post-harvest. Occurs only sporadically and especially during seasons with
frequent rain and warm temperatures.
70% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
35% |
|
occasional control |
8% |
|
rarely a problem |
26% |
|
never a problem |
30% |
Damage Caused: Primarily damages
fruit but may also infect twigs and spurs. Blossoms, mature fruit and succulent
tissue are infected. Blossom clusters will turn brown or black. Stem cankers
are rare. Young girdled stems die back, resulting in a brown withering of the
leaves. Salmon or rust colored berry rot can ruin fruit quality. Infested fruit
often exhibit a soft, sunken area. Spores spread to “good” fruit during and
after harvest, causing significant post-harvest losses.
% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Pruning
old canes and small twiggy wood for optimal air circulation and harvesting
frequently are beneficial. Varieties in which the fruit hangs ripe for a long
time on the bush prior to picking are especially susceptible. No varieties may
be resistant when the weather conditions are favorable for the disease.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
100% harvest |
1% |
|
*Written-in information from survey
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Anthracnose
41% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Aliette |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall First cover* 2nd+ cover** |
0 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Captan |
13% |
60% full |
20% excellent 47% good 27% poor |
Early-mid bloom First cover 2nd+ cover |
0 |
4 days |
|
|
Captan plus Benlate |
10% |
45% full |
18% excellent 45% good 9% poor |
|
- |
- |
|
|
Captec |
6% |
71% full |
57% excellent 43% good
|
Early-mid bloom Petal fall First cover |
0 |
72 hrs |
|
|
Chlorothalonil (Bravo) |
0% |
|
|
Early-mid bloom |
42 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Rovral |
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ziram |
0% |
|
|
Early-mid bloom |
ns |
48 hrs |
Apply at loose bud scale stage followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom. |
|
Other Pesticides Reported*** |
|||||||
|
Topsin |
2% |
50% full |
50% excellent 50% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Lime sulfur |
2% |
100% full |
50% excellent 50% good |
|
|
|
|
ns=not specified
*First cover = about 10 days after petal fall; some berries begin to color
**2nd+ cover = 10 days from previous cover, repeat as needed
*Written-in information from survey
Botrytis Blight
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: It is
present every year, but only causes severe damage during cool, wet periods
several days in duration.
68% of respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
27% |
|
occasional control |
13% |
|
rarely a problem |
27% |
|
never a problem |
31% |
Damage Caused: Primarily affects
blossoms and ripening fruit, although under certain circumstances the fungus
can cause stem blight as well. Rotted berries typically have a gray cast of the
mycelium and spore-bearing structures present.
% Acres
Affected: 30%
Timing of Control: Infection occurs
largely during bloom on flowers. The most critical period for infection is
during bloom.
Yield Losses: 3%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Disease
is most severe where excessive nitrogen has been used, where air circulation is
poor, or where frost has injured blossoms. Varieties possessing tight fruit clusters
are particularly susceptible to the disease.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Botrytis Blight
35% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Aliette |
0% |
|
|
Petal fall |
0 |
12 hrs |
Repeat at 7-10 day intervals during bloom if long rainy periods predicted. |
|
Benlate |
3% |
67% full |
100% excellent |
|
- |
- |
|
|
Captan |
11% |
54% full |
31% excellent 31% good 23% poor |
Early-mid bloom |
0 |
4 days |
|
|
Captan plus Benlate |
11% |
54% full |
15% excellent 62% good |
|
- |
- |
|
|
Captec |
3% |
100% full |
67% excellent 33% good
|
Early-mid bloom Petal fall |
0 |
72 hrs |
Repeat at 7-10 day intervals during bloom if long rainy periods predicted. |
|
Chlorothalonil (Bravo) |
0% |
|
|
Early-mid bloom |
42 |
12 hrs |
|
|
Rovral |
0% |
|
|
Early-mid bloom |
0 |
24 hrs |
Do not make more than 4 applications per year. |
|
Ziram |
0% |
|
|
Early-mid bloom |
ns |
48 hrs |
Apply at loose bud scale stage followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom. |
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Topsin |
1% |
100% full |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
ns=not specified
*Written-in information from survey
Fusicoccum Canker
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 65% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
22% |
|
occasional control |
14% |
|
rarely a problem |
30% |
|
never a problem |
34% |
Damage Caused: Infects blueberry
stems causing dieback and plant decline. On young (1-2 year old) stems,
extensive stem infections quickly lead to flagging and dieback of the entire
stem. On warm, dry days shoots will suddenly wilt and die due to the stem
girdling.
% Acres Affected: 20%
Timing of Control: Spores are
released from March to mid-July, and infection probably occurs during this
period. New infections occur following rains during the time tender new tissue
is present and temperatures are at 50-72½ F. New infections can occur
throughout the growing season.
Yield Losses: 5%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices:
Sanitation is essential. Prune out affected canes. Varieties differ in their
resistance to this disease. Avoid practices such as late season fertilization
that make bushes more vulnerable to winter injury. Winter-injured bushes are
more susceptible. Cold stress may play a part in increasing disease damage.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Pruning |
4% |
100% good |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Fusicoccum Canker
25% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Benlate |
4% |
100% full |
20% excellent 60% good
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
Captan plus Benlate |
7% |
50% full |
38% excellent 50% good
|
|
- |
- |
|
|
Ziram |
1% |
|
100% good
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant |
ns |
48 hrs |
Apply at loose bud scale stage, followed 7 days later. Do not apply later than 3 weeks after full bloom. |
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Lime sulfur |
2% |
50% full |
50% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Captan |
2% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Topsin |
1% |
100% full |
100% good |
|
|
|
|
|
Captec |
1% |
100% reduced |
100% excellent |
|
|
|
|
ns=not specified
*Written-in information from survey
Group B – Diseases identified by survey as significant problems in some years
Witches’ Broom
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 68% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
10% |
|
occasional control |
16% |
|
rarely a problem |
30% |
|
never a problem |
44% |
Damage Caused: Diseased blueberry plants have broom-like masses of swollen,
spongy shoots with shortened internodes and leaves reduced in size. Heavily
infected plants produce no fruit.
% Acres Affected: 3%
Timing of Control: Plant removal after harvest.
Yield Losses: 10%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: The best
control strategy is to eradicate the alternate host (fir trees) within 1200
feet of the blueberry plants. Eradication of diseased blueberry plants
effectively eliminates the disease from an affected field.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical
Controls for Witches’ Broom
Chemical controls do not exist.
Blueberry Stunt
Type of Pest: Mycoplasma-like
organism
Frequency of Occurrence: 65% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
8% |
|
occasional control |
5% |
|
rarely a problem |
34% |
|
never a problem |
53% |
Damage Caused: Affected plants are
dwarfed with shortened internodes, excessively branched, low in vigor with
small downward cupped leaves which turn red prematurely. Fruits on infected
bushes are small, hard, lack flavor, ripen late if at all, and remain attached
to the plant much longer than they would on healthy plants.
% Acres Affected: Unknown
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Diseased
bushes cannot be cured and must be removed from the field. Using virus indexed
plants is also helpful.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical
Controls for Blueberry Stunt
Chemical controls do not exist.
Group C – Diseases identified by survey as infrequent problems
Phytophthora Root Rot
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
3% |
|
occasional control |
11% |
|
rarely a problem |
33% |
|
never a problem |
53% |
Damage Caused: In severely infected
bushes, the entire root system is reduced in stature and is totally black.
Above-ground symptoms include chlorosis and reddening of the leaves, smaller
leaves, defoliation, branch dieback, death of entire canes, stunting, and death
of the entire bush.
% Acres Affected: 5%
Timing of Control: Apply in spring
before growth begins in established plantings. In new plantings, apply at or
just after planting.
Yield Losses: 20%
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: The
disease is avoided through careful site selection before planting. Heavy soil
which becomes waterlogged or suffers from a high water table should be avoided
when selecting a site. Internal and surface water drainage should be improved.
Most varieties are susceptible to the disease, although some varieties may
better tolerate heavy infections.
|
Other Practices Reported* |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, |
|
Hilling |
1% |
100% excellent |
*Written-in information from survey
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Phytophthora Root Rot
3% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Aliette |
0% |
|
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant |
0 |
12 hrs |
Apply as a 5 ft. band. Do not tank mix with copper compounds or apply to foliage with copper residues or phytotoxicity may occur. |
|
Ridomil Gold |
4% |
75% full |
100% good
|
Dormant/ delayed dormant
|
30 |
48 hrs |
Apply only as an emergency use, not as a routine or preventative treatment. *In new plantings, do not exceed 3.6 gallons/A within 12 months of harvest or illegal residues may result. |
Powdery Mildew
Type of Pest: Fungus
Frequency of Occurrence: 64% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
3% |
|
occasional control |
5% |
|
rarely a problem |
37% |
|
never a problem |
55% |
Damage Caused: When severe infection
occurs, defoliation may occur.
% Acres
Affected: 1%
Timing of Control:
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Some
cultivars are more resistant than other cultivars.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical
Controls for Powdery Mildew
1% of crop reported treated for this pest in 2002.
|
Pesticide |
% of Respondents Reporting Use |
Of Respondents, Typical Rate Reported |
Of Respondents, Efficacy Rating Reported |
Appli-cation Periods |
PHI days |
REI hours |
Application Notes and Comments |
|
Sulfur |
1% |
100% full |
|
|
0 |
24 hrs |
|
|
Other Pesticides Reported* |
|||||||
|
Liquid sulfur |
1% |
100% full |
|
|
|
|
|
*Written-in information from survey
Mosaic
Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 61% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
1% |
|
occasional control |
7% |
|
rarely a problem |
40% |
|
never a problem |
51% |
Damage Caused: Infected plants
become unproductive. It may take several years for a bush to show symptoms.
% Acres Affected: Unknown
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Most
varieties appear to have field resistance to the virus. Infected bushes cannot
be cured and must be removed promptly.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Mosaic
Chemical controls do not exist.
Red Ringspot
Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 60% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
2% |
|
occasional control |
6% |
|
rarely a problem |
34% |
|
never a problem |
59% |
Damage Caused: Production of the
bush is seriously reduced and the berries become pockmarked and unattractive.
% Acres Affected: Unknown
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices:
Bluecrop, Collins, Jersey, Rancocas and Weymouth are resistant or tolerant to
the disease. Infected bushes must be rogued out.
Biological Control
Practices: None
identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Red Ringspot
Chemical controls do not exist.
Blueberry Scorch
Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 61% of
respondents reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
4% |
|
occasional control |
3% |
|
rarely a problem |
33% |
|
never a problem |
62% |
Damage Caused: The disease is
characterized by dieback of blossoms and young vegetative shoots in the spring,
followed by a flush of growth in the summer. The roots suffer injury and
production of the bushes can be greatly impacted.
% Acres Affected: 1%
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: The sole
control strategy is to remove affected bushes.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Blueberry Scorch
Chemical controls do not exist.
Blueberry Shoestring Disease
Type of Pest: Virus
Frequency of Occurrence: 61% of respondents
reported this pest occurring.
|
routine annual control |
3% |
|
occasional control |
1% |
|
rarely a problem |
33% |
|
never a problem |
63% |
Damage Caused: Diseased leaves are narrow, wavy, and somewhat
sickle-shaped. Flowers may be red-streaked, and berries turn purple
prematurely. Within a few years, berry production drops dramatically.
% Acres Affected: 1%
Timing of Control: NA
Yield Losses: Unknown
Regional Differences: None
identified
Cultural Control Practices: Prevent
disease introduction by buying disease-free plants, destroying wild plants near
the planting, and removing diseased plants.
Biological
Control Practices: None identified
Postharvest Control Practices: None
identified
Chemical Controls for Blueberry Shoestring Disease
Chemical controls do not exist.
Crown Gall
Type of Pest: Bacteria
Frequency of Occurrence: Since
blueberries are grown on acid soils, and the crown gall bacterium does not grow
well in an acid situation, the disease occurs infrequently.
62%