Crop Profile for Peanuts in Georgia

Prepared: December, 2003


General Production Information

Production Regions

Commercial production of Georgia peanuts is concentrated in the southwestern part of the state, although peanuts are grown commercially across the southern half of Georgia.



Cultural Practices

Note: Georgia posts a tremendous amount of information about peanut production on the web. Analysts are strongly encouraged to visit http://commodities.caes.uga.edu/fieldcrops/Peanuts/homepage.shtml

Potential Worker Exposure

Growers typically apply an insecticide and an herbicide at planting. Nearly 90% of the soil insecticide is loaded into the spreader with a "lock and load" system that limits exposure to the mix/loader.

Nearly all applicators use ground equipment with enclosed cabs. Larger farms are more likely to have closed cabs.

During the season, a typical farm would make from 8-12 pesticide applications per year. A typical applicator could cover about 25 acres per hour. On smaller farms (less than 500 acres), a single individual may make all of the pesticide applications. A large peanut farm may have 2,500 acres, but the operation would be more likely to have several people that drive spray rigs.

When the peanuts reach the flowering stage, nearly all growers make one application of gypsum to provide calcium for the developing peanuts.

Many growers cultivate the row middles one time near the beginning of the season. Additional cultivation during the season is rare.

From 40-50% of the Georgia peanut acreage is irrigated each season using a center pivot system. Sporadically during the season, someone may have to visit the pivot to implement repairs or adjustments. It is not necessary for anyone to enter the field to move irrigation equipment.

About 20% of the Georgia peanut acreage is formally scouted. Peanuts are scouted once per week. It takes a typical scout about 2 hours to scout 100 acres of peanuts. Nearly all professional scouts are scouting other crops (e.g., cotton) in addition to peanuts. These scouts spend a majority of the day scouting fields or traveling to the next location.

Nearly all peanuts are monitored informally. The grower or an employee will spend 1-2 hours per week driving near the fields or walking in the field margins.

About 20% of the Georgia peanut farms monitor weather instruments to determine when irrigation should be applied or to determine the risk of disease. The grower or a farm employee may spend up to 3 hours/week visiting weather instruments in or near each field. The monitoring equipment may in the field or at the field margin.



Insect Pests

In 2001, insect losses (yield reduction + cost of control) in Georgia peanuts were about $12.8 million. Thrips were responsible for about $5.8 million in losses, followed by lesser cornstalk borer ($2.1 million), wireworms ($1.8 million), 3-cornered alfalfa hopper ($1.3 million), and spider mites ($1.2 million). For more detail, review IPM publications at www.ent.uga.edu.

Thrips are tiny, slender insects that jump or fly when disturbed. There are several species that feed on peanuts and they range in color from yellow to black. They feed in the buds of plants on the young folded leaflets, causing scarred, deformed leaves often referred to as "possum-eared." Tobacco thrips and the less common western flower thrips are also vectors of the tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), a very serious disease in Georgia peanuts. From 85-90% of the Georgia peanut acreage is treated with insecticide at planting to control thrips.

Foliar pests feed on the above-ground plant parts. In addition to thrips, a complex of lepidopteran larvae consume the leaves. Several types of leafhoppers and spider mites can cause losses in peanuts. Considerable foliage can be lost without reducing peanut yields. If a good growth of foliage is present, four or more foliage-feeding caterpillars per foot of row are required to cause a yield reduction. When mixed populations of foliage feeders are present, growers use an insecticide recommended for the insect or insects that make up a majority of the population.

Soil pests attack the peanut seedlings, and they attack the pegs and pods that become peanuts. About 25% of the Georgia peanut acreage is treated with a soil insecticide to manage these pests.

Insecticides. According to USDA data about 80% of peanut acreage was treated with insecticide in 1999. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/#field

Review additional insecticide recommendations in the Georgia Pest Management Handbook.

Nonchemical alternatives and IPM

Most growers base insecticide applications on field monitoring that typically includes counts of beneficial insects. Growers will also try to preserve beneficial populations by using lower rates of insecticides. There are few or no releases of predators/parasitoids, and very little biopesticide (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis) is used in Georgia peanut production.



Weeds

Nearly all Georgia peanut fields are infested with weeds. Weeds are generally categorized as grasses, broadleaves, and nutsedges. Effective weed management is essential to produce commercial peanuts. A comprehensive discussion and slideshow about weed control in Georgia peanuts can be found at this web site. http://www.cropsoil.uga.edu/weedsci/slides/peanut2000/

The ten most troublesome weeds in Georgia peanuts are:

The USDA reported that 99% of the Georgia peanut acreage was treated with herbicide in 1999.

http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/#field

Herbicides

The University of Georgia recommends a wide variety of herbicides to manage weeds in peanuts, and new herbicides are regularly registered for this market. An individual grower will choose herbicides based on the pressure and composition of the weed population. Review pesticides recommended for weed management in the Georgia Pest Management Handbook.
http://www.ent.uga.edu/pmh

Nonchemical alternatives and IPM

Growers incorporate other techniques in an IPM program for weeds, but nonchemical methods cannot replace the critical role of herbicides in peanut production. Growers can only cultivate peanuts early in the season. Hand weeding is not common, but it may be used in small areas where herbicides failed to control weeds.

No effective biological controls are available for peanuts, although birds, soil-borne fungi, and insects may help to reduce the bank of weed seeds.

Growers cultivate, rotate crops, and manipulate both row spacing and planting dates to reduce weed competition in peanuts.

Cultivation is the most widely used and effective cultural control for weeds. However, cultivation can also exacerbate problems with soil-borne diseases.

Concerns about peanut diseases are generally the force driving rotation with other crops, but rotation also benefits weed management. Peanut production promotes populations of weeds (e.g., legumes) that are taxonomically similar to peanuts and perennial weeds such as nutsedges. Rotating peanuts with a grassy crop, like corn or pasture, can provide marked reductions in both disease and weed pressure.

Peanuts have traditionally been planted in single rows 36 inches apart. Many growers are replacing this row spacing with twin rows 5-7 inches apart. The canopy between these twin rows closes more quickly, and weeds are reduced. Peanut yields have been increased with the twin row spacing, but there has been no significant reduction in the need for herbicides.

The plating period for Georgia peanuts is limited because the growing season is relatively long, but growers must delay spring planting until the soil is warm enough. Most growers prefer to plant as early as possible within the planting window to let the peanuts gain an advantage over later-emerging weeds. Additionally, a peanut variety that matures quickly may avoid late-season weed problems.

Nutsedges

The two nutsedge species, yellow and purple nutsedge, are herbaceous perennials that regrow from soil borne tubers. Tubers germinate sporadically, and dormant tubers cannot be killed with herbicide application. Additionally, nutsedge foliage is very waxy and grows upright. Herbicides do not stick well to the nutsedge foliage, and absorption by the plant is very low.

Grasses

Grass control is critical for peanut production. In addition to competition for water and nutrients, uncontrolled grasses bind the peanut pods in a sod mat of roots, which greatly interferes with harvesting. Texas panicum is the most important grassy weed in Georgia peanuts. Other grasses have smaller seeds, and herbicides are more effective in preventing germination. Texas panicum has a relatively large seed, which can germinate below the herbicide application zone.

Broadleaves

Broadleaf weeds compete with peanuts for light, water, and nutrients. Additionally, taller weed species interfere with the effective application of fungicides. Therefore, controlling weeds is essential for good control of diseases. Eight of the ten most troublesome weeds in Georgia peanuts are broadleaf weeds.



Diseases

According to Georgia Plant Disease Loss Estimates, leaf spots and white mold were the most expensive diseases in 1998 with loss + cost of control exceeding $50 million for each of these diseases. Nematodes ($24.4 million in loss + cost of control), tomato spotted wilt ($18.4 million), and cylindorcladium black rot ($13.3 million) completed the top five most costly peanut diseases in 1998. For details, refer to UGA Extension Bulletin Pat 99-002 available at www.ces.uga.edu

White Mold (fungus Sclerotium rolfsii)

White mold (also called southern stem rot) results in a brown dry rot of the lower stem and crown and one or more branches wilt and die. Up to 10 to 12 adjacent plants may wilt and show signs of the disease. The stems of diseased plants (and often the ground and lower leaves) are covered with a dense, white fungus growth. Small, brown fungus fruiting bodies similar to mustard seed usually form on dead stems and leaves.

Peanut Leaf Spots (fungi, early leaf spot, Cercospora arachidicola; late leaf spot, Cercosporidiuum personatum)

The first symptoms of both diseases are small, pale yellow or blanched spots. These soon enlarge and become tan to black. The color of the spot on the lower leaf surface can often be used to distinguish between early and late leaf spots. Early leaf spot is brown and late leaf spot is black.

Nematodes (root-knot Meloidogvne arenaria, M. hapla)

Above-ground symptoms are yellowing, wilting, and stunting of plants in areas from a few feet in diameter to several acres. Roots usually have knots and galls that vary in size from slight swelling to large galls 3 or 4 times the size of the root. Pegs and pods are usually distorted with galls.

Nematode injury is often difficult to diagnose. Damage to plants can easily be mistaken for the symptoms of a nutritional deficiency, a soil-related disorder, drought stress, and soil-borne diseases, such as southern stem rot or CBR. Often, the foliage looks normal while the roots and pods are badly galled. Symptoms of nematode injury never occur uniformly across a peanut field.

Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) has emerged as a critical disease of Georgia peanuts. TSWV is transmitted to peanuts primarily by the tobacco and western flower thrips. The virus is acquired by the larvae feeding on diseased weeds or peanuts and is transmitted by the adults. Viruliferous adults overwinter in the soil or survive on TSWV-infected weeds that grow during the winter months. This virus is not seed transmitted.

Many production decisions are affected by the risk of tomato spotted wilt virus, including varietal selection, planting date, pest control, and row spacing. The Georgia peanut team has developed a series of recommendations and risk factors that are used by peanut growers wherever this disease if found. Analysts are advised to visit this web devoted to TSWV. http://www.ces.uga.edu/pubcd/b1165-w.html

Cylindrocladium Black Rot

The soil fungus Cylindrocladium crotalariae causes Cylindrocladium black rot. Losses from black rot are most likely in areas where Virginia-type peanuts have been grown.

High soil moisture levels favor black rot, particularly in the late spring and early summer. Black rot symptoms are often confused with symptoms of white mold, root-knot nematode, and tomato spotted wilt virus.

Limb Rot/Pod Rot

Limb rot, caused by Rhizoctonia solani, is chiefly a disease of irrigated peanuts, although losses may also occur in dry-land peanuts. Excessive water, fertilizer, and tractor traffic will exacerbate disease severity and pod loss. Limb rot is most frequently seen during periods of hot, wet weather in late summer or early fall.

Seed and Seedling Disease

Several soil-inhabiting fungi such as Aspergillus niger, Rhizoctonia solani, and Pythium spp. can cause seed to rot or seedlings to die quickly (damping off). These conditions are greatly exacerbated when unfavorable soil conditions (cool, wet) retard germination and seedling development. Soil that is excessively dry favors development of A. niger. Poor quality seed and replanting a field to peanuts following peanuts will also increase the risk of seed/seedling disease.

Fungicides. Data from USDA indicate that 85% of Georgia peanut acreage was treated with chlorothalonil in 1999, followed by tebuconazole (47%), sulfur (15%), propaconazole (14%), azoxystrobin (10%), and copper hydroxide (3%). http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/#field

Regular fungicide applications are critical for peanut production. Growers typically apply fungicides during the season on a 10-14 day schedule for a total of 7-10 fungicide applications per year. The schedule and number of applications are determined by weather conditions and disease pressure. Growers use several different products to manage disease resistance.

A typical fungicide rotation would be 1-2 applications of chlorothalonil, followed by 1-2 applications of pyraclostrobin or azoxystrobin fungicide, followed by 1-2 applications of chlorothalonil, followed by 1-2 applications of tebuconazole.

Most growers are conscious of the potential for disease resistance to fungicides, so they are careful to rotate among fungicides in different chemical families. For example, a grower would avoid rotations with azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, and propiconazole + trifloxystrobin. Likewise, propiconazole + trifloxystrobin would not be rotated with tebuconazole.

Review pesticides recommended for disease management in the Georgia Pest Management Handbook

Nonchemical alternatives and IPM. Disease management in peanuts is based on a combination of tactics. Effective fungicides are a critical component. Chlorothalonil is particularly important because of its role in resistance management. Other products, with a more targeted mode of action, are much more susceptible to resistance problems. The availability of chlorothalonil will prolong the effective life of many other fungicides.

Growers use a variety of cultural practices to reduce disease losses. Some type of crop rotation program is used on nearly all peanuts. Deep tillage and resistant cultivars are common tools in peanut production. Every peanut farmer works to provide optimal water and fertilizers. Finally, growers typically plant peanut seed that has been treated with fungicide and/or insecticide. In 2003, Extension specialists recommended seed treated with Vitavax PC, Granox PFM, Pro-Ixed System II or III, or Gustafson 4-Way.



Contacts and Resources

For complete details about peanut production in Georgia, visit the UGA Peanut Website at http://commodities.caes.uga.edu/fieldcrops/Peanuts/homepage.shtml.

This web page carries all of the information about the UGA peanut program, including the UGA peanut team and links to a wide variety of peanut publications about production.

John A. Baldwin, jbaldwin@uga.edu. UGA Peanut Agronomist.

John P. Beasley, jbeasley@uga.edu. UGA Extension Agronomist.

Tim Brenneman, arachis@tifton.uga.edu. UGA Plant Pathology.

Steve L. Brown, bugbrown@uga.edu. UGA Entomology.

Albert Culbreath, leafspot@tifton.uga.edu. UGA Plant Pathology.

Eric Prostko, eprostko@uga.edu. UGA Weed Scientist.

The Georgia Pest Management Handbook. [Paul Guillebeau, Ed.] Published annually. Special Bulletin 28.

Profile prepared by Paul Guillebeau, IPM/Pesticide Coordinator, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602 pguillebeau@bugs.ent.uga.edu